Re: on line paper & affectivity

Robert Bahruth (rbahruth who-is-at claven.idbsu.edu)
Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:32:58 +0100

Amy, I find your comments interesting. I don't know how much of it is tied
directly to e-mail and how much is related to the modalities we're using.
I wrote dialogue journals with my ESL/Bilingual students for years and
found they would "talk" with me and share much more in the journals than
they would in a face to face situation. They were extremely candid and
sincere, often telling me details of their lives I wasn't sure I wanted to
know about fully.

The suprasegamentals of communication you mention which are communicated
subtly at times -- and no so subtly at other times -- provides me with
opportunities to distinguish for my students between deep and surface
stuctures of human communication. When I ask one of my children to say
"I'm sorry" to another of my children whose feelings they have hurt,
sometimes they say "I'm sorry!" in a way where the intonation (deep
structure) contradicts the literal message of what they say (surface
structure). Even the grammatical category of ritual insult provides a good
example of how friends can call each other derrogatory names (e.g. "You old
S.O.B. I haven't seen you in years!) and the smile and accompanying tones
contradict the impact of the message. That's why New Yorkers often reply,
"Smile when you say that." Interesting ponderings. roberto