> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 1998 12:19 PM
> To: xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: re Values
>
>
> Eugene writes:
> Sounds good, but the problem starts when values changes and/or
participants
> disagree or unclear about values.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> ---------------------------
> These are loosely coupled, mediated, systems of activity
> we are talking about. I would say "discoordintion arises
> when values change and/or participants."
>
> The discoordination may be felt as a problem, that is for sure.
> But we are talking about historically developing social systems
> here, problems are a part of the process. The question is,
> which problems, with what consequences for development.
> mike
>
What development? I think, when values are changed, the directionality,
which defines any development, is also changed. For example, when US
mainstream psychology has trasformed from behaviorism to cognitivism
mainstream psychologists stopped carring about development new and "better"
maze experiments. The latter just became irrelevant for the mainstream
psycholgy.
In my view, history is a reconstruction of the past for the present needs of
some specific individuals or groups. In my view, the struggle for defining
what is "best practice," history, and development is covert struggle among
social groups about values and survival. What do you think?
Eugene