Re: zpd excess

Kevin M. Leander (k-leand who-is-at students.uiuc.edu)
Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:42:36 -0500 (CDT)

I appreciated Diane's comments. As much as I'm attracted to activity
theory, I often also feel that it prompts toward a depeopled
landscape. Michael Erickson's and Paul Prior's comments on the historical
situatedness and development of the zpd metaphor were also very helpful.

One of the important issues here, again highlighted by Diane, is where we
situate teaching in all this. Maybe we most readily associate teaching
with interaction itself, which seems to fit the zpd better than something
like constructing an entire activity system. But, teaching obviously
is situated in many different activities, and is not just interaction with
students. And, in this different activities, the range of
sociohistorical agents at work should shift in important ways. I'm
thinking of Dewey here, and the sense of context
construction, organization, selection being at least as important as
interpersonal, ongoing engagement. While a functional systems approach
might better describe one
activity, the zpd could be more illuminating for the other.