RE: jana who-is-at xs4all.nl (Jan Aukes)

WHE_ECAHAN who-is-at FLO.ORG
Mon, 12 Aug 1996 9:01:56 -0400 (EDT)

Jan, I apologize for being such a lousy correspondant. I am not working
directly on anything directly related to religion and psychology at
the moment, but I am always interested in the ways in which religious
problems or values found their way into psychology -- especially developmental
psychology since that is my area of interest. If you have not yet
seen the book, I recommend to you Fernando Vidal's biography of the
young Piaget, entitled *Piaget before Piaget.* The book traces the
influence of religion on the early formulationof Piaget's psychology.

I am a developmental psychologist with special interet// interests in
the history of developmental psychology. I've written and published some
on J.M. Blad/// J.M. Baldwin, the child study movmement in the U.S., the
history of childcare in the U.S., the influence of the Rockefeller
Foundation on the history of child develoment research, etc.

But I am most interested perhaps (though not published) in the ways
in which older questions about children -- their welfare, their
rearing, their competencies , -- and in general how we define the Good in
childsren and children's lives through psychology. In short, how
did the "sci// *scientiric/// &// (sorry, my fingers are not working).
In short, how did secular, *scientific* psychology become a source of
values about children and families? And where is the influence of traditional
religious values in this transformation.

Best,
Emily Cahan