Re: CMU and situated cognition

FM (FM_+a_CC_+lFM+r%Carnegie who-is-at mcimail.com)
Sat, 18 May 96 20:38 EST

What Jay says about transfer seems to boil down to: Sometimes it does.
Sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it isn't worth the effort (but maybe
sometimes it is?). And sometimes it works better for some than for
others. That seems to me to be a plausible agenda for research, and
maybe for practice.

As I read the research so far it suggests that sometimes it helps to
be explicit about the elements or dimensions on which future
occasions/events/problems might be similar. I can relate to your
point about physicists and mathematicians, but I don't think that the
argument here is in favor of the "purely" abstract - it is that maybe
abstractions help mediate transfer or direct attention to the aspects
that are the focus of instruction (as in Gelman re: fractions??).

I just realized this resonates with a long ago xlchc discussion of
genre - and whether we are doing folks a favor by not introducing them
to priveleged or arcane genres - or _was_ that part of the discussion?
I didn't get into it at the time.

Fritz Mosher