Deaf kids of Deaf parents are at an advantage over deaf kids of
non-signing (usually hearing) parents because their language interaction
is based on a more competent adult model than newly signing parents. We
are beginning to find, however, that after many years of signing, the
hearing parents do confer certain advantages over the deaf parents
because of stronger links to the English-based school system. This does
not apply across tothe board to ALL deaf parents or ALL hearing parents
(indeed, I think Padden and Humphries are notable exceptions to the deaf
parents group), but I am interested in what kinds of knowledge (ways of
knowing?) Deaf parents can give their Deaf kids that are different from
hearing parents to their deaf kids, and vice versa, particularly when it
comes to learning English in whatever form, especially literacy.
Hope I've made that clear.
I am very familiar with *Deaf in America*, which I have used as required
reading in my courses in the past. Still think it's a great book.
And, I'm very comfortable with being addressed as "Tane".
On Mon, 11 Sep 1995, Mike Cole wrote:
>
> Hi Tane Akamatsu-- Fascinating range of interests. How do Vygtosky,
> Bakhtin, and "that bunch" inform you work on ASL? I am particularly
> interested because Carol Padden and Tom Humphries here at UCSD (Do
> you know their book, *Deaf in AMerica*? share some of your theoretical
> interests.
> mike
>
>
Tane Akamatsu
Toronto Board of Education
takamatsu who-is-at oise.on.ca