[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] ISCAR Newsletter?
- To: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] ISCAR Newsletter?
- From: Ron Lubensky <rlubensky@deliberations.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:20:48 +1100
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <509A19F2.1080002@mira.net>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <509A19F2.1080002@mira.net>
- Reply-to: rlubensky@deliberations.com.au, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
Hi Andy,
I too thought the ISCAR newsletter interview article was very good. I
especially liked your comparison of CHAT to interactionist approaches,
which you and I have discussed before. One area that continues to be
messy, as you suggest, is the relationship of CHAT to social
constructIVism and social constructIONism.
Since CHAT's first home is developmental psychology, it is out of the
work of Piaget and Papert that these terms are usually defined, and so
closely that they are often conflated. While these theories acknowledge
the social and perhaps cultural influences on learning and
interpretation, they centre on a cognitivist, mental model view of
knowledge. There is also the normative aspect of giving control to the
learner to construct his or her individual world-view.
The other social constructIONism comes out of communications and
sociology (e.g. Berger and Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality,
1966), that challenges the inevitability of categorisations that are
taken for granted in common discourse, and which form the bases for many
institutions. This post-modern constructIONism generally places
knowledge in discourse and interaction, but in more recent scholarship
focuses on the cultural situation of the individual. This isn't a
learning theory but rather a critical, meta-theoretical stance. To
complicate matters, there are different strands with various accounts of
what should be treated as real, true, essential, scientific, etc. and
how communication should relate to action. It also challenges academic
research standards with advocacy for interventionist approaches to
practice. For an interdisciplinary expansion of CHAT, I think this
constructIONism offers a rich field for comparison.
--
Ron Lubensky
http://www.deliberations.com.au/
0411 412 626
Melbourne Australia
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca