[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Peter Smagorinsky on concepts
- To: Christine Schweighart <schweighartc@gmail.com>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Peter Smagorinsky on concepts
- From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:57:16 +1100
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <CAEBC5xp2xU69H0QVEibKC_1nZ+oExVx=fnFiaBo+RF7G9n5SRg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHJHQS9hO0ijvfMKa+iFf-dyDWXErLnAcBCUx4xkTO=fmWAd4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAG1MBOGqhECb7NP7nQ36+qyOWOUGgNnOJB17Ep-JywBhePHz6w@mail.gmail.com> <4F14B036.3060705@mira.net> <CAG1MBOH-s4YD=NB+=sVngXTb=npWgade3paNqw6ZBAqhQVGaaQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F14D0AA.5080200@mira.net> <CAG1MBOGuJS8cQdcNWVSRoQMjg7sHmXMU==jUu28if_7AWf9sdw@mail.gmail.com> <4F14F6E6.2090507@mira.net> <CAG1MBOE15DFFq7HK=uj_YCCnh0=eBWZOZfRZw4o_zb7d9y9poA@mail.gmail.com> <4F156283.9020404@mira.net> <CAG1MBOFF3naP6NE_R9NyPmqzuFnY4TqAQJM19Qv1nDd_1dRfCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEBC5xqKd-EzPNx12LC-R4cJO7UAaNJ0=y_dCBTB5QNKtRPvwA@mail.gmail.com> <4F15931C.5030807@mira.net> <CAEBC5xp2xU69H0QVEibKC_1nZ+oExVx=fnFiaBo+RF7G9n5SRg@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Sorry, Christine. I just can't make any sense of this.
Andy
Christine Schweighart wrote:
Dear Andy,
I can't relate to geometry:) but after the 'Instructional Science'
thought, a 'conceptual development' ( not that 'concept' has become
static) might be such that the 'product' would be enabling 'new'
learning in a different form of living... so geometry enables a
different way of living in the world, and qualitatively different
learning possibilities flow from that.
Our 'naming' ( in that everyday understanding of 'objectifying') -
tends to hide the on-going dynamic - this is a big problem - how to
keep in mind on-going dynamic as we 'name' to make communication
'easier'... this relation was in another of your messages.
Yes the historical inheritance - but there is always current living
contradictions, and from time to time 'big chunks' are deemed to be
'too redundant' to these ( working on 'phenomenon'). ( Flogiston etc)
- how that works its way back to curriculum communities is another
pandoras box...
Christine.
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca