[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] "Inner Form" of Word, Symmetry, Ivanov Bateson?
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] "Inner Form" of Word, Symmetry, Ivanov Bateson?
- From: Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:35:31 -0500
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTimAeWMKBW93PAacMWUuUY9D6VoX0g@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BANLkTi=cEmH3C+WV0QOxn8hB49FiPE=LxA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimcCpkosR=34aYYBCqLdBP=r177Gg@mail.gmail.com> <08A1C524-CEBF-41A7-9341-53B0A02BFED6@duq.edu> <BANLkTimAeWMKBW93PAacMWUuUY9D6VoX0g@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
The epigenetic inheritance we talked about here a year or so ago would be similar. Ok, now how does this relate to word meaning and brain asymmetry?
Martin
On May 30, 2011, at 7:11 PM, Huw Lloyd wrote:
> On 31 May 2011 00:03, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote:
>
>> Huw,
>>
>> I think you win the prize for maximal name-dropping in a single sentence.
>> How about you now unpack that, serially, for those of us operating with only
>> half a brain?
>>
>>
> Here's a quick first go at unpacking it. :)
>
> In 'Steps to An Ecology of Mind', Bateson described processes of biological
> adaption in terms of an example of a giraffe and, in particular, it's
> heart. Part of this interest appears to have been notions of plasticity.
> Of being able to reach beyond a 'comfort zone' and being predisposed to this
> kind of plasticity. If I remember correctly, the example given was of a
> modestly sized giraffe that was able to mate with, or compete for a mate
> with, stronger giraffes (stronger in the sense of a given genetic
> predisposition to strength). The plasticity effectively allows the giraffe
> to adapt his/her biology ontogenetically (through, say, increased muscle
> mass by exercise). Now we have a situation where a humble sized giraffe
> with good potential is able to mate with a range of giraffes including the
> super-sized variant.
>
> The strong Lamarkian assertion is that things we learn ontogenetically can
> be passed on to off spring. Traditional Darwinian theory doesn't allow for
> this, the evolution is in one direction, and the adaption is achieved
> through mutation and "random" cross-seeding.
>
> However, in the same way that Waddington demonstrated with fruit fly
> ontogenetic change/adaption that is carried over into offspring, we can
> follow the thread of this feedback using these concepts. Waddington showed
> that by intervening in fruit fly pupae development, and thereby encouraging
> particular wing formation changes to arise, that later generational
> offspring 'inherited' this change in wing construction.
>
> We can conceive, logically, of the possibility of this occurring with the
> aid of the concept of variety. An organism can be conceived of an unfolding
> variety, starting from its genetic code, which we can take as expressing its
> phylogeny. The interpretation of this genetic code, the unfolding process
> of a living organism, comprises its ontogeny.
>
> Now, the genetic code, in addition to the environment in which it is
> interpreted, expresses the organism's developmental variety, the different
> ways in which the codes can be made sense of. So in order to see an
> 'inherited' ontogenetic attribute it is not necessary to change the genetic
> code, rather it may suffice to change the interpretation of the code
> provided that the code has sufficient expressive variety to encapsulate the
> adaption.
>
> Hence the idea of the plasticity of the giraffe, and its increased potential
> to pass on ontogenetically derived 'tips' to its offspring. This comprises
> of a more directed form of evolution which, I believe, is missing from the
> classic Darwinian formulation (although I'm guessing that this is all par
> for course in biological/DNA research etc).
>
> There is more logic to this Lamarkian-like process, which I could describe a
> bit more (it's a bit late here). Though this may elaborate sufficiently?
>
> Huw
>
>
>> Martin
>>
>> On May 30, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>> With respect to inner form, the pieces that I find intriguing are
>> Bateson's
>>> take on Lamarkian-like development in conjunction with Waddington's
>>> discoveries and Beer's approach to requisite variety.
>>
>> __________________________________________
>> _____
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca