Re: [xmca] Vygotskian framework to moral development

[Ivo Banaco <ibanaco@gmail.com>]

Thank you for all these avenues...seems that Mark Tappan is the consensus
here in moral development issues.

What do you think about the work of Lutz Eckensberger. He uses an action
theory approach fundamentally based on Ernest Boesch action theory approach
to Cultural Psychology. Any thoughts?

Ivo



On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Tony Whitson <twhitson@udel.edu> wrote:

> Bakhurst's new book _The Formation of Reason_ is definitely relevant for
> this, although the book's focus is more broadly on human formation in light
> of Vygotsky et al. and the philosophy of Bildung.
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Martin Packer wrote:
>
>  Mark Tappan has written on this. Searching Google Scholar with "mark
>> tappan vygotsky" will bring them up.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On May 23, 2011, at 4:38 AM, Ivo Banaco wrote:
>>
>>  Does anyone is aware of the literature applying a Vygotskian (or AT)
>>> framework to moral
>>> development? Need some help as I'm beginning my research on the topic and
>>> find Kohlberg model and Blasi's concerns on the moral self to be dominant
>>> on
>>> moral development literature. I wonder why...
>>>
>>> Ivo
>>> __________________________________________
>>> _____
>>> xmca mailing list
>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________
>> _____
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
> Tony Whitson
> UD School of Education
> NEWARK  DE  19716
>
> twhitson@udel.edu
> _______________________________
>
> "those who fail to reread
>  are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
>                  -- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca