Re: [xmca] concepts

[Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>]

For a definition of 'activity,' and related terms, there's the paper by Charles Tolman:

<http://www.igs.net/~pballan/AT2.htm>

Martin

On Apr 17, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Huw Lloyd wrote:

>> :) Huw has that one at the moment.
>> 
> 
> :)
> 
>> But as "activity" is the fundamental concept of my
>> philosophy, I can't define it in terms of anything else,
>> just explain it, to give you the general idea.
> 
> Here's my take:  if it's a concept, then it can be derived from other
> concepts within the constellation (paradigm/framework).  Everything is
> related.
> 
> e.g. process can be derived from interaction of structure.  System is
> tricky, but do-able.
> 
> Huw
> 
>> But, a
>> philosophy can only have one concept like that!
>> 
>> Andy
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca