[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] The Grip of "Direct Instruction"
- To: David H Kirshner <dkirsh@lsu.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] The Grip of "Direct Instruction"
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:01:21 -0700
- Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture,Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=cI6I4JZ2oyyIrwepow83IEhgvI0RQ7YIj5i/KKh4Y6Q=; b=cpgS5TSboF1RYFzdziMGZzltr6aaNUXqCLve1oxKntpDj96pHGhWrBvbQSGVaXDtYn aSP4uYpxDamWtoU0zR4df9X2uVDUUv0VfKgkdlCwCl4QNjQ1gEUK3CO0/ffbek+GxJeR eVEZz5mx3szk7WDNUoiJogy/QxQMWPgUu4tiI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=TAyvUR69p8fJq7GyucDIHUBZmPffRwZ0+77hSfiIU2aLmHfx6ZPibHqM8BaHtefmkI by/WlAkvEqRPfFdexDHSuMEJBZ6LwIxjI1YKKqLe5532RKddCzk/+oi+kY+g2scgSdaZ W/v/hoo2VRBBxL9wEXCayNjNCWnYwJGysPcxU=
- In-reply-to: <731CECC23FB8CA4E9127BD399744D1EC02819795@email001.lsu.edu>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <AANLkTi=GOCDpQzAdi_oEWaYuZBadcdTi9OvbhdF86-=X@mail.gmail.com> <731CECC23FB8CA4E9127BD399744D1EC02819795@email001.lsu.edu>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Thanks, David.
If anyone is interested I can send draft of paper for APA. It is similar to
my AERA address (but less interesting-- damned print!).
Sure, crappy instruction can come from "we pretend to teach they pretend to
learn" regimes. The examples I gave all have pretty good evidence in their
favor and in many cases detailed differentiation of what gets cut out as a
coherent program enters the sausage grinder.
While I am certainly willing to believe that people get into Universities
having acquired levels of learning that are very low ( I deal with transfer
students from California colleges, and direct admitees into UCSD who cannot
handle, for example, a book as complicated as *1984*, I do not believe that
it is a plausible account of the average Canadian university's entering
classes.
Apropos, however, of your point. Recent news reports concerning unemployment
indicate that there are a couple of hundred pretty well paid jobs going
begging in the US right now because there is a dearth of people who can
handle the work tasks. Not a new story -- one which puts many industries in
the business of paying new employees to learn a lot before they start
working.
I'll read your paper with interest.
mike
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, David H Kirshner <dkirsh@lsu.edu> wrote:
> Mike,
> Thanks for sharing that anecdote.
> Unfortunately there is a mirror image in reform teaching to the
> dysfunctional portrait you presented of direct instruction of procedures
> disconnected from meaning-making: engagement in activity with no vision
> on the teacher's part of what or how learning is to be supported. I
> think there is good evidence that the Math Wars in the US initiated not
> from ideological resistance (that came later), but from true horror
> stories of kids in dysfunctional reform classrooms, some of them getting
> to college unprepared as learners (getting into college is not always a
> sign of a successful K-12 learning experience). As a community, I don't
> think we've done a good job of articulating what it is that makes
> activity-based learning environments effective.
> This was the topic of my AERA paper in May, "The Incoherence of
> Contemporary Pedagogical Reform," which I attach in case anyone is
> interested. (The meat of the paper starts about half way through at the
> section titled "Theoretical Analysis.")
> David
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu]
> On Behalf Of mike cole
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 2:39 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture,Activity
> Subject: [xmca] The Grip of "Direct Instruction"
>
> Yesterday I presented a longish paper at the American Psych Association
> meetings here in San Diego.
> A lot of it was about what here I would refer to as "activity-based"
> curriculum projects -- their virtues, problems, and apparent inability
> to
> gain traction against recitation scrips and direct instruction. A major
> general finding was that when implemented as designers intend, such
> program
> work, but they tend quickly to be undermined by teachers who strongly
> believe that direct instruction on elements not under control of a
> meaningful whole is THE only way to be effective.
>
> A person from Canada posed a question after prefacing her remarks by
> saying
> she agreed with all I said, and thank you, etc. She began by saying that
> in
> Canada such approaches had gained a lot of
> traction in k-12 education, but they were causing a problem at the
> university level. She phrased the problem roughly as follows: "We get a
> lot
> of students who are great at collaborative learning, but it appears to
> strip
> them of their attention spans. And, doesn't a subject like calculus
> REQUIRE
> direct instruction?"
>
> These comments/questions knocked me over. I have long disliked the
> discourse
> of short attention span in school kids, which appears to masquerade far
> too
> often as a proxy for "the kids will not sit still and control themselves
> doing stuff they do not understand and do not understand why they should
> try
> to understand."
> But I never expected that the the charge of "reduced attention spans"
> would
> be attributed to college students (who have succeeded in getting in to
> college, after all) with the causal factor inducing this "deficit" being
> that their former (successful) modes of learning engendered by
> activity-centered instruction). Moreover, I was surprised that anyone
> believes that calculus can be taught by "direct instruction" with no
> effort
> made to subordinate procedural knowledge to knowledge of the potential
> motives for learning.
>
> I think I was experiencing exactly the challenges confronting the many
> really interesting and successful innovators in education (we might
> start
> here with Dewey, but I have in mind modern scholars) who want to make
> education a meaningful process to students but who find that their
> efforts
> are rapidly deconstructed once they leave the home ground.
>
> Anyone else have observations of this kind?
> mike
>
> Two things struck me
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca