[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Fwd: [COGDEVSOC] Call For Papers: Special Issue on Mindreading, Review of Philosophy and Psychology
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Fwd: [COGDEVSOC] Call For Papers: Special Issue on Mindreading, Review of Philosophy and Psychology
- From: Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:48 -0700
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oeKGeFWDwsTpxLRm9eWrYe4Sdk816BIqEMIBFsoUp40=; b=T0mcPB+9Ip9Y0qKQkxddd7+2l29ERtOuFieYNaM5NxecBMCdLZT51EFlvTn3Z7ucs3 HW4g2touiA08fMYTAyYT9t7qGkK/KmG1S22GiCyl06F4JdCPboEMvTzOnY/ZDVV7gdgT xPHDK6j3byIgMaXjRu3hyLpfWRdT2voBRl+J0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MGX+P4JM/UVCe49IPsZhScjVh94laBGZ3fkXLa558Z2hOaTDBjKnpOGo/lpE7Unztz P0bnR0dOVrY4q1hAVMtkg/W9O0M1siimvrInRpmJEEjU8N3EM722vTd9TpA+SzMzsIY+ 7UdaL06WiLGKpzdfXh6cKJN8hg6o3wqoQdj4g=
- In-reply-to: <0B32BD9D-42B4-49C0-A89B-F218648A4B8B@duq.edu>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <51DF72AC-D97B-49F5-89B4-E8577D5C2599@bbk.ac.uk> <0B32BD9D-42B4-49C0-A89B-F218648A4B8B@duq.edu>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Hi Martin
This topic of "mind-reading" vs "non-mind reading" models of young infants
CAPACITY for attending to and ENGAGING with other "minds" [persons] is a
fascinating topic which has been discussed previously in CHAT conversations
on this listserve.
I recently read V. Reddy's book which recommends a 2nd person societal
interactional microgenetic model of non-mind reading. I have sympathy for
this particular perspective. However, I would like to read more widely on
this particular topic.
Do you or others on this listserve have any recommendations for further
articles which engage with the pros and cons of the various models in a
spirit similar to the proposed intent of the special issue of the Review of
Philosophy and Psychology?
I'm curious about the various theories of young infants capacity for
engaging with others within sociogenesis, ontogenesis, and microgenesis.
However, I'm also interested in how the various models of "infants engaging
with others" become transformed in the transition to
TRANS-situational understandings [the development of "higher" mental
functions.]
Larry
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote:
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Victoria Southgate <v.southgate@bbk.ac.uk>
> > Date: August 2, 2010 4:22:07 AM GMT-05:00
> > To: cogdevsoc@virginia.edu
> > Subject: [COGDEVSOC] Call For Papers: Special Issue on Mindreading,
> Review of Philosophy and Psychology
> >
> > Social Cognition: Mindreading and Alternatives
> >
> >
> >
> > Special issue of the Review of Philosophy and Psychology
> >
> >
> >
> > Guest Editors:
> >
> > Daniel D Hutto, University of Hertfordshire
> >
> > Mitchell Herschbach, University of California, San Diego
> >
> > Victoria Southgate, University of London
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CALL FOR PAPERS
> >
> > Deadline for submissions: 1 December 2010
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Human beings, even very young infants, exhibit remarkable capacities for
> attending to, and engaging with, other minds. A prevalent account of such
> abilities is that they involve “theory of mind” or “mindreading”: the
> ability to represent mental states as mental states of specific kinds (i.e.,
> to have concepts of “belief,” “desire,” etc.) and the contents of such
> mental states. A number of philosophers and psychologists question the
> standard mindreading and wider representationalist framework for
> characterizing and explaining our everyday modes and methods of
> understanding other people. One possibility is that infants may be
> exhibiting sophisticated yet non-conceptual, and possibly
> non-representational, mind tracking abilities that do not equate to any sort
> of mindreading.
> >
> >
> >
> > Proponents on both sides of this debate must adequately accommodate
> recent work in developmental psychology. Experiments involving a variety of
> nonverbal tasks — e.g., the “violation of expectation” paradigm and
> anticipatory looking tasks, as well as nonverbal tasks involving more active
> responses —suggest that young infants can understand others’ goals,
> intentions, desires, knowledge/ignorance, and beliefs. Perhaps most
> prominent are studies suggesting infants as young as 13 months of age are
> selectively responsive to the false beliefs of others, well before they are
> able to reliably pass standard verbal false belief tasks around 4 years of
> age.
> >
> > This special issue of the Review of Philosophy and Psychology aims to
> create a dialogue between the mindreading and non-mindreading approaches to
> basic social cognition. Contributors are asked to clarify their theoretical
> commitments; explain how their accounts compare with rivals; and how they
> propose to handle the emerging empirical data, particularly that from human
> developmental psychology. Themes and questions to be addressed include but
> are not limited to:
> >
> >
> >
> > - Infants as young as 13 months old display a systematic
> sensitivity to the beliefs of others. Does it follow that they must be
> operating with a concept of belief, or indeed, any concepts at all?
> >
> > - Normally developing children become able to attribute false
> beliefs to others between the ages of 3 and 5. Does it follow that they must
> be operating with a “theory of mind” or the equivalent?
> >
> > - What does mental attribution minimally involve? What exactly
> distinguishes mindreading from non-mindreading approaches to early social
> cognition? Are there theoretical reasons to prefer one over the other?
> >
> > - What exact roles are mental representations thought to play in
> mindreading approaches? What kind of mental representations might be
> involved? Can a principled dividing line be drawn between representational
> and non-representational approaches?
> >
> > - How precisely should we understand the explicit/implicit
> distinction as invoked by certain theorists?
> >
> >
> >
> > Invited contributors
> >
> > - José Luis Bermúdez, Texas A&M University
> >
> > - Pierre Jacob, Institut Jean Nicod
> >
> > - Andrew Meltzoff, University of Washington
> >
> >
> >
> > Important dates
> >
> > - Submission deadline: 1 December 2010
> >
> > - Target publication date: July 2011
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > How to submit
> >
> > Prospective authors should register at:
> https://www.editorialmanager.com/ropp to obtain a login and select “Social
> Cognition: Mindreading and Alternatives” as an article type to submit a
> manuscript. Manuscripts should be no longer than 8,000 words. Submissions
> should follow the author guidelines available on the journal's website:
> http://www.springer.com/13164 Any questions? Please email the guest
> editors: d.d.hutto@herts.ac.uk, mherschb@ucsd.edu, v.southgate@bbk.ac.uk
> >
> >
> >
> > About the journal
> >
> > The Review of Philosophy and Psychology (ISSN: 1878-5158; eISSN:
> 1878-5166) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly by Springer and
> focusing on philosophical and foundational issues in cognitive science. The
> aim of the journal is to provide a forum for discussion on topics of mutual
> interest to philosophers and psychologists and to foster interdisciplinary
> research at the crossroads of philosophy and the sciences of the mind,
> including the neural, behavioural and social sciences.
> >
> > The journal publishes theoretical works grounded in empirical research
> as well as empirical articles on issues of philosophical relevance. It
> includes thematic issues featuring invited contributions from leading
> authors together with articles answering a call for paper.
> >
> >
> >
> > Editorial board
> >
> > Editor-in-Chief: Dario Taraborelli, Surrey. Executive Editors: Roberto
> Casati, CNRS; Paul Egré, CNRS, Christophe Heintz, CEU.
> > Scientific advisors: Clark Barrett, UCLA; Cristina Bicchieri, Penn; Ned
> Block, NYU; Paul Bloom, Yale; John Campbell, Berkeley; Richard Breheny, UCL;
> Susan Carey, Harvard; David Chalmers, ANU; Martin Davies, ANU; Vittorio
> Girotto, IUAV; Alvin Goldman, Rutgers; Daniel Hutto, Hertfordshire; Ray
> Jackendoff, Tufts; Marc Jeannerod, CNRS; Alan Leslie, Rutgers; Diego
> Marconi, Turin; Kevin Mulligan, Geneva; Alva Noë, Berkeley; Christopher
> Peacocke, Columbia; John Perry, Stanford; Daniel Povinelli,
> Louisiana-Lafayette; Jesse Prinz, CUNY; Zenon Pylyshyn, Rutgers; Brian
> Scholl, Yale; Natalie Sebanz, Nijmegen; Corrado Sinigaglia, Milan; Barry C.
> Smith, Birkbeck; Elizabeth Spelke, Harvard; Achille Varzi, Columbia; Timothy
> Williamson, Oxford; Deirdre Wilson, UCL
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr. Victoria Southgate
> > Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellow
> > Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development
> > Henry Wellcome Building
> > Birkbeck, University of London
> > Malet Street
> > London, WC1E 7HX.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca