[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Origin of infant communication
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Origin of infant communication
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:28:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mUXUScj7LsrTPylQTPs42q6xBWoHFRJZqI7fPMlEfIo=; b=BT4SuGlRri7O5jRQEVeaykLaJdPYSTr1aI5bR21CU0KSmXO6cJbi4kpNwxAG0jklh/ vH5h2Ln5kSNQ0dGp3/oGd6OPhgupgXaYm+51RF1qDzh4z27tGQGXgMpdV429lwn2Y8JN 1xvVX6Hg7zt26hcfSgwKd78IeLKSg2sOdkAYo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=EQerClcUlVf1b6EAYS+4X1l5tDcum3XZE28kVlMuCwCCtenShbjMbke7wL929IrdVi jAy73OXuFnG5eekxa1C/lsjvVxJobDPRA2VKhIFFe1XjpTOMejSMOtsNN/0MMgJH72EM 0hR7UBdGXlObjwHuFqTG7aUq5hGLtokTClVmc=
- In-reply-to: <d028e8286f019.4bda797b@shaw.ca>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <d028e8286f019.4bda797b@shaw.ca>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
This would be an excellent candidate for a book to be reviewed in MCA,
Larry. Are you volunteering?
mike
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Larry Purss <lpurss@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Avis and Mike and Martin [and others on the infant theme]
>
> What are the origins of infant engagement? I want to give some ideas from
> Vasudevi Reddy. She writes
> "A second-person approach [being addressed by a YOU] seems not only explain
> infant behavior better than either a first person {I position} or a third
> person "spectator" approach. It also changes the lens through which we
> PERCEIVE the problem of other minds that is expressed in much of the
> developmental literature. [that is, as a spectatorial process of observation
> of mere behavior across a gap] The important difference between a 2nd
> person approach and a 1st person approach is that the emphasis here is NOT
> on recognition of the SIMILARITY to self of other peoples acts, but,
> crucially, of the EXPERIENCE of a RECIPROCAL RESPONSE to the others acts.
> The gap between minds becomes hard to find in this re-embodiment and this
> re-embedding.
> Infants are capable of entering into dialogue [recognition and response]
> with other people remarkably early in life. {I would add this dialogical
> process EXPERIENCED recognition and response continues to INFORM
> communication throughout the lifespan}.
>
> Reddy points out many philosophers take this 2nd person perspective [or
> lens]: W. James called it "being noticed", Bahktin, the recognition of an
> "answering consciousness", Hegel, the awareness of recognition, and Buber,
> the experience of the I-thou relation.
>
> This 2nd person concept refers to more than just "interpersonal
> attraction", more than just a recognition of a SIMILARITY of another person
> to the self, and more than just an INFERENCE from observation of movements.
> THE YOU is radically implicated in a 2nd person stance.
>
> Larry
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca