[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] praise and criticism: chinese-American comparison
- To: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] praise and criticism: chinese-American comparison
- From: yuan lai <laiyuantaiwan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:05:08 -0800
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+xRGFyBksktTAe3pHelKI2kXZ9yGt0kSj53QzXp+XJY=; b=jsU9LA7H19cM3ZHvZ+grwHNxyDCJOh9IT+sxN4Ll4HcP5ZDg8INzwYCB/n+LxTYhpa 67r4GTTbrFNKjRoTBx09pZHwdIoxFlEyshXH7/BsXfnzM+uy5DuTOPnxFjqg0TvNFUBq Q/ep1wqTT/28RfPfdWIv21EFFeDWPRLeEQXi4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AD37qhpsmDuRVdwu0gjFTs3veqAO4sjpZH04prL0/GUjOfxXaXSeEDnzps2pp3T5vW gPhJyhZUhlxitMzootFnKQ1U5EkxSO2u6MkE/U9Dyrn1zNbs7KpGNO2N9ApgcdejZK7F KWTsSZPvDcb+g6m+UwEB2fD1PnGj8LJiFw8NI=
- In-reply-to: <30364f990912240909i3e8b1c54pfa6c251db9f0728e@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <30364f990912240909i3e8b1c54pfa6c251db9f0728e@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Mike, I just checked my emails since I posted my wild idea on what the
equivalent of meta-analysis in qualitative data would look like, and other
ramblings. My new year's resolution is do lots of listening in.
Thanks for the article of Miller et al. I like it very much. Narrative is a
powerful socializing tool. I take it that children's telling
autobiographical stories with what audience and co-narrators and in what
situations, and how the stories evolve, has much potential for researching
child development. It seems to me that conformity to group norms versus
nurturing of individuality explains well the roles of criticism and
praise/self-esteem, as you suggested in the thread title.
Yuan
p.s. I'm here not to learn the discourse of xmca per se (just in case it may
sound alarming), but that of socio-historical approaches. My dissertation is
about children's understanding of the social world and applies a
neo-Piagetian perspective.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:09 AM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
> More on the issue of the discourse patterns in Chinese & American
> socialization attached for them who
> cares.
> mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca