PS The two Howard-Jones attachments are working fine ... :-)) Thanks! On Sep 16, 2009, at 2:28 AM, Steve Gabosch wrote:
What interesting books, Emily. Thank you.Virginia Berninger and Todd Richards, who are at the UW Seattle in my neck of the US woods, say (as revealed by Amazon Books Look Inside) in the Introduction to this textbook that they rely on Luria:"In Parts I and II we lay the groundwork for the complexities of systems of brains and minds at work and in doing so draw on the work of a Russian neuropsychologist, A.R. Luria (1973), who introduced the notion of functional systems of a brain at work. However, Luria based his conclusions on study of individuals with brain damage, whereas we base ours on study of normally developing individuals with and without learning differences and not on those with brain damage. Although Luria did not study the processes of teaching and learning academic subjects in the same depth or setting as contemporary researchers in many disciplines do, we credit Luria with the fundamental insight that multiple brain structures may be involved in one function and that the same brain structures can participate in more than one functional system."p8, Brain Literacy for Educators and Psychologists (2002)Great to see Luria given this credit. Question: Where does Luria's The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology (1973) fit in to this kind of study? Is his book accessible, is it too out of date, etc.?Thanks much for the attachments. (I keep getting the same Howard- Jones article out of the first two attachments, btw).Next AERA conference I go to, I will pay some serious attention to what the people in neuroeducation are doing - there really does appear to be something burgeoning there. My take so far ... see what you think ... is that one can expect all the current major trends in the general social, life and natural sciences to reappear in this new interdisciplinary field - but on a new level, reflecting some of the advances of recent decades, such as an increased awareness of the central role of cultural experience ... just as, for example, cognitive science in its developmental years absorbed some of the newer ideas of its time (computer science, game theory, general systems theory, etc. etc.). Neuroeducation seems to be consolidating the surge in knowledge from research in cognition and learning in recent decades - and especially, finding ways to theorize about and apply the vast new research insights that brain imaging technology is making possible. At the same time, some of the dominant trends in contemporary neuroeducational theory seem to revolve around time-worn biological reductionist ideas - almost with a vengeance. New bottles, but some of the same old wine. Am I in the ballpark?- Steve On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Duvall, Emily wrote:Glad you found it interesting, Steve!To start, I guess it depends on how much you want to know, but generally I find it important to work with diagrams and video, some kind of visual support (I've started to include brain drawings as an assignment in my class) as well as articles. The Berninger & Richards text works well inconjunction with the Brain Coloring Book to get you going. You don't have to memorize everything, but it's helpful to understand the macro and microstructures from a systems perspective in order to begin to bridge the discourse. Others may have different favorites, but I suggest The Jossey-Bass Reader on the Brain and Learning... and (brand new, I haven't read my copy): The Educated Brain: Essays in Neuroeducation. Meanwhile, I've attached a couple of general articles by Howard-Jones and one of the more interesting pieces on VAK by Sharp et al.As to where this discussion is taking place? I am still relatively new and don't have any peeps other than those I am cultivating in my classes and several open minded folks on the neuroscience faculty with UIdaho.~em -----Original Message-----From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca- bounces@weber.ucsd.edu]On Behalf Of Steve Gabosch Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:16 PM To: eXtended Mind, Culture, ActivitySubject: Re: [xmca] Neuroscience connections to learning and relearningEmily, I much appreciated your links to the Science Daily articles andthe Usha Goswami article. I learned a lot. Thanks much, and please keep links like this coming! These are areas I know I would like to learn much more about. A) On astrocytes etc.: If you had to puttogether a crash course for CHAT-oriented researchers on neuroscience,what authors, books, articles etc. come to mind that you would draw from? B) As for the overview Goswami offers in her 2006 article regarding 1) what neuroscience actually is discovering about learning processes and how they might apply to the classroom and 2) what neuromyths are emerging along with perhaps other hazards of the commercialization of neuroeducation knowledge ... where is more of this kind of discussion taking place these days? - Steve On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Mike Cole wrote:Thanks Em-- And I googled Goswami neuromyths. Also very enlightening.Goswami did early work with Ann Brown, former collaborator with us at LCHC. Now if we go back a step and look at the people who created the label of learning sciences, and their backgrounds, the shift from "developmentalpsychology" to developmental sciences, the appearance recently of thehandbook of cultural developmental science, ......... what a tempest! Must be a teapot in there somewhere. Simultaneous, fractilated paradigm shifts? Does anyone have the luxury of being able to organize a science studies interrogation of these movements? Seems really worthwhile. mike On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Duvall, Emily <emily@uidaho.edu> wrote:Thanks Mike... :-) In general I like Goswami's work; I find her discussion of neuromyths compelling and have had my grad students do additional research on some of them. I am also particularly interested in ways to try to negotiate across different fields. I've attached my favorite Goswami and a nice intro to neuroeducation. As a side note: Monica (Hansen, who frequently shows up on the list serve and is one of my doc students) and I took a neurosciencejournal club/ seminar last spring and found ourselves trying to makesense of the work that is done with regard to education. We are taking another seminar right now and some of the folks who were in last year's class are presenting journal articles in their field, but are trying tomake the links to human experience, particularly education. It's beeninteresting to discover how open minded the students and faculty are... one of the computational neuroscience faculty has taken up some Vygotskyreading as well as neuroeducation... of course Luria's work is a dooropener and a point of mutual interest. ~em -----Original Message----- From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca- bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Cole Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:41 AM To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity Subject: Re: [xmca] Neuroscience connections to learning and relearningNo one picked up on your interest in neuroeducation, Emily. A lot ofwhat I read in this area strikes me as almost entirely without any appreciation of education, or human experience, as a culturally mediated, co- constructed process. Do you have a favorite general ref you could point us to that you resonate to?? mike On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Duvall, Emily <emily@uidaho.edu> wrote:I thought some of you might one or both of these article summaries interesting. The first really speaks to the new field ofneuroeducationwith regard to cellular learning... the nice thing about the summaryisit gives you an overview of learning at the cellular basis... veryclearand easy to understand. Plus an introduction to astrocytes... :-) The second piece actually discusses re-learning, which has been atopiclately. What I personally find so interesting is the role of experience in learning and relearning... I found myself thinking back to ShirleyBriceHeath's work... it would be fun to go back to her work and look at her study through a neuroeducation lens. 1. Star-shaped Cells In Brain Help With Learning http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090911132907.htm Every movement and every thought requires the passing of specific information between networks of nerve cells. To improve a skill or to learn something new entails more efficient or a greater number of cellcontacts. Scientists can now show that certain cells in the brain --theastrocytes -- actively influence this information exchange. 2. Forgotten But Not Gone: How The Brain Re-learns http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081117110834.htmThanks to our ability to learn and to remember, we can perform tasks that other living things can not even dream of. However, we are onlyjust beginning to get the gist of what really goes on in the brainwhenit learns or forgets something. What we do know is that changes in the contacts between nerve cells play an important role. But can thesestructural changes account for that well-known phenomenon that it ismuch easier to re-learn something that was forgotten than to learn something completely new? ~em Emily Duvall, PhD Assistant Professor Curriculum & Instruction University of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene 1000 W. Hubbard Suite 242 | Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 T 208 292 2512 | F 208 667 5275 emily@uidaho.edu | www.cda.uidaho.eduHe only earns his freedom and his life, who takes them every day bystorm. -- Johann Wolfgang Goethe _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca<howard- jones .pdf > < neuroeducation .pdf ><sharp_et_al_2.pdf>_______________________________________________xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca