[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] AERA 2010: Symposium about Emotions and Symposium about perezhyvanie



Mabel, Ana,

I think these are great topic suggestions and questions. I believe there were 8 papers or so presented at the AERA 2009 symposium on emotions you two organized at this last AERA conference. I attended this symposium and really enjoyed it. Thanks for doing it - and now, for doing two more.
For the authors of these papers from this last symposium that are  
willing, could you make their papers available for xmca'ers, perhaps  
as file attachments?  I have been meaning to ask about this.  I got to  
read Lois Holzman's interesting paper from a hard copy she made  
available, for example, but haven't seen some of the other papers ...  
and would really like to.  And others on xmca might like to see them,  
too.  Might even generate some interesting xmca discussion ...  :-))
Thanks!

- Steve






On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:36 AM, Mabel Encinas wrote:


Dear all,


This is an invitation to participate in two symposia: one about emotions, and one about the specific concept of "perezhyvanie". Ana Marjanovic-Shane will submit this second one, and I will submit the first one.
In both symposia, the idea of working about emotions involves two  
kind of research:

Research focusing on the study of emotions

Research that involve some analysis/discussion about emotions, rather than only superficially acknowledging them.
The challenge in these two symposia is to present what is what CHAT  
offers for the understanding of emotions, i.e. what is our research  
contributing to the understanding of emotions?, what are our  
findings?, and mainly, what are the implications for practice (both  
in terms of policy making and in terms of the work of practitioners)  
that make CHAT an important approach to develop? I see this as a  
collective task, in which many of us are engaged, and despite our  
differences, we are in the way of constructing a CHAT approach  
necessary to understand (and ‘do things’ taking into account)  
emotions, in the context of the educational and social challenges  
that we face in contemporary societies.
As there is a growing group of scholars that have worked about  
perezhyvanie (or maybe perezhivanije), a concept that is not easy to  
translate into English, the idea is that this might generate a  
particular interest in the concept, and its implications to research  
practices and other kind of practices in education. In this way,  
this particular symposium will be submitted for people that work on  
the concept and want to present what it offers to the understanding  
of emotions.
Why we want to submit two symposia?
Last year we submitted a ‘big’ symposium about emotions (i.e. a symposium with many presenters), and it can make more sense if we submit two, in order to have two slots to further discuss on these issues. This is why we thought that a second symposium could be submitted on this particular concept of perezhyvanie.
I suggest the following questions that we can address in both  
symposia:

How do you understand emotions in CHAT?

What is the specificity of CHAT compared to other (or another) approach(es): psychoanalysis, social and emotional learning –SEL-, emotional intelligence, emotional labour, emotions in contemporary neuroscience, etc.?
What kind of methodologies we have developed in CHAT in order to  
study emotions (audio, video, conversation analysis, etc.)? And how  
do these methodologies are linked to the theoretical construction of  
a CHAT approach?
How do we study emotions in CHAT to avoid 'dichotomies' such as  
cognition/emotion, individual/social, etc.?
What are the practical implications of the study of emotions in  
CHAT? This can involve considerations that go from practical  
implications (for example to practitioners such as teachers or  
psychotherapists), to political implications.
In the second symposia, this question would involve a discussion  
about the concept of perezhyvanie. Ana foresees that the fourth  
question might be particularly addressed in it, but all the other  
questions can make sense for engaging in rich discussions about  
emotions in this symposium as well.
In both symposia, the questions work as a general structure, which  
will be accommodated according to the people that express interest.  
You might want to discuss one, two or three of the questions. Please  
consider that the time is quite tight (possibly 10 to 15 minutes for  
each person). Depending on what the people that participate choose  
to discuss, the shape and focus that each of the two symposia will  
take. We might select to focus in one or some of the questions  
depending on the presenters’ interests.
As this year there was some criticism of the organisation in small  
groups, for next year we can try to have conventional presentations  
in a row, and maybe invite more than one discussant of the papers.  
However, other organisations might be agreed among the participants  
in each symposium.
All these are general outlines but the actual shape of each symposia  
will be defined depending on the interests of the people presenting.
What we need to do?


If you are interested, please send an expression of interest as soon as possible, defining in few lines what questions you would be interested in addressing. Please write to Ana (ana@zmajcenter.org) and me (m.encinas@ioe.ac.uk) – preferably please not to xmca, as this just saturates everybody’s inbox.
Then, by the 10th of July, please send what is stated by AERA call  
for proposals:
A summary (maximum of 500 words) of your paper/presentation which  
needs to address “the basic elements of a research or scholarly  
paper/presentation” (http://aera.net/uploadedFiles/Publications/Journals/Educational_Researcher/3804/301-322_05EDR09.pdf 
):



-        Objectives or purposes

-        Perspective(s) or theoretical framework

-        Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry

-        Data sources, evidence, objects or materials

- Results and/or substantiated conclusions or warrants for arguments/point of view
-        Scientific or scholarly significance of the study or work.  
(Theoretical or methodological papers must include information  
equivalent to element 4.)
Also:



- Each presenter must indicate whether the research being conducted for the paper has been reviewed for human research protection and approved by an institutional review board (IRB) or that IRB review is “Not Applicable."
-        Each presenter will be asked to indicate his/her  
willingness to participate in the AERA Online Paper Repository.  
Participation is encouraged. If the option is selected, the final  
commentary paper will be placed in the Repository.
-        All presenters at accepted symposium, structured poster,  
working group roundtable, and demonstrate/performance sessions must  
prepare and upload a paper or commentary paper into the AERA online  
submission system at least three weeks before the start of the  
Annual Meeting. Papers or commentary papers are a maximum of 1,000  
words. Papers will be available to all participants in the session.

Best wishes,

Mabel



Mabel Encinas

m.encinas@ioe.ac.uk











What can you do with the new Windows Live? Find out
_________________________________________________________________
Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca