[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] a minus times a plus
- Subject: Re: [xmca] a minus times a plus
- From: Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:06:28 -0700
- Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=eDja8Gz0e/zx35p+XikosjyWgydXOGnvuHdNuHEt98I=; b=eG/iB7LSmphX7WngV0id7zQkWb52pk2HKm2DjCOHYXtE2Az6I2Rp8ze3ftjuChHxaS Zev4K52wuodqrPMbhCuXwxhSQt3XPZg/CBGN9uZrCpIHUNs78vJ+G1BZ1QldV0QtZRPp xXRT9DBGd6xxnzY+zw/zi9GX4EDP9Xuvfx0m0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:cc:content-type; b=pbm1fa+zCXz+z04OG7IRTTulRPr+Zy+olhLgVn7fZTltBhnrwA9SYjJkhQhv7Grkau QudCUH/qd0tS7PmYe6Ty9U4vT2qAu5xgO2K3MErkFsBGhspooby7AaWzVcCECx6Pex/9 UpcHqxLQRde+RyQ6tJEN1lICyHVr7V1geXVoY=
- In-reply-to: <2C46D7A7-AD94-441C-AABD-269045835E3D@umich.edu>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <30364f990904271547o5b4df21eifca69bf8318483f2@mail.gmail.com> <2C46D7A7-AD94-441C-AABD-269045835E3D@umich.edu>
- Reply-to: mcole@weber.ucsd.edu, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Great!! Thanks Ed and Eric and please, anyone else with other ways of
explaining the underlying concepts.
Now, we appear to have x and y coordinates here. If I am using a number line
that ranges along both x and y axes from (say) -10 to +10 its pretty
easy of visualize the relations involved. And there are games that kids can
play that provide them with a lot of practice in getting a strong sense
of how positive and negative positions along these lines work.
What might there be of a similar nature that would help kids and old college
professors understand why -8*8=64 while -8*-8=64?
Might the problem of my grand daughter, doing geometry, saying, "Well, duh,
grandpa, its just a fact!) arise from the fact (is it a fact?) that
they learn multiplication "facts" before they learn about algebra and
grokable explanations that involve even simple equations such as
y+a=0 are unintelligible have become so fossilized that the required
reorganization of understanding is blocked?
mike
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Ed Wall <ewall@umich.edu> wrote:
> Mike
>
> It is simply (of course, it isn't simple by the way) because, the
> negative integers (and, if you wish, zero) were added to the natural numbers
> in a way that preserves (in a sense) their (the natural numbers) usual
> arithmetical regularities. It would be unfortunate if something that was
> true in the natural numbers was no longer true in the integers, which is a
> extension that includes them. Perhaps the easiest way to the negative x
> positive business is as follows (and, of course, this can be made opaquely
> precise - smile):
>
> 3 x 1 = 3
> 2 x 1 = 2
> 1 x 1 = 1
> 0 x 1 = 0
>
> so what, given regularity in the naturals + zero) do you think happens
> next? This thinking works for, of course, for negative times negative. The
> opaque proof is more or less as follows.
>
> Negative numbers are solutions to natural number equations of the form (I'm
> simplifying all this a little)
>
> x + a = 0 ('a' a natural number)
>
> and likewise positive numbers are solutions to natural number equations of
> the form
>
> y = b ('b' a natural number)
>
>
> Multiplying these two equations in the usual fashion within the natural
> numbers gives
>
>
> xy + ay = 0
>
> or substituting for y
>
>
> xy + ab = 0
>
> so, by definition, xy is a negative number.
>
> Notice how all this hinges on the structure of the natural numbers (which
> I've somewhat assumed in all this).
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:47 PM, Mike Cole wrote:
>
> Since we have some mathematically literate folks on xmca, could someone
>> please post an explanation of why
>>
>> multiplying a negative number by a positive numbers yields a negative
>> number? What I would really love is an explanation
>> that is representable in a manner understandable to old college professors
>> and young high school students alike.
>>
>> mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca