[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Hedegaard article



I much enjoyed Mariane Hedegaard's paper, though my comments will be quite bare. Is someone passing the discussions on this list to Mariane?
There are a number of aspects of this paper which I 
particularly appreciate: the effort to introduce notions of 
the good life and 'a good development' and other ethical 
considerations into the scientific study, and further 
including questioning of the power relations, interests and 
values entailed in the formation of views about child 
development. These notions create an internal tension within 
the idea of development which I think a purely descriptive 
approach can capture.
I also appreciated the intention to include "children's 
projects, their intentions, their everyday practices, and 
their interacitons with other persons ..." I think this is 
necessary if we are to have a theory of development which is 
really able to deal with *human beings* rather than sponges.
I think the tripartite setting: individual, the various 
particular institutions, and the state, is good. My only 
qualification is that these days "state" is more or less to 
be subsumed under "particular institutions" and can no 
longer be deemed as "universal".
Finally, I would like to see an explicit recognition that 
crises arise in the development of the child which do not 
arise from conflicts between institutions, such as 
parental-culture and school-culture. A good social situation 
of development will generate crises for the child which can 
only be overcome by development, otherwise there would be no 
development at all. That said, I think it is a promising 
line of enquiry to look at the kind of development children 
have to make when confronted with the kind of institutional 
conflict the young Danish-TUrkish boy confronted.
Thank you very much Mariane.

Andy

Mike Cole wrote:
Taylor and Francis appears to have left us hanging again on our article for
discussion. Or I am doing something wrong.
In any case, attached is the article by Mariane Hedegaard that you voted for
for discussion.
read, enjoy, ask questions, expound truths!!
mike


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden http://home.mira.net/~andy/ +61 3 9380 9435 Skype andy.blunden
Hegel's Logic with a Foreword by Andy Blunden:
http://www.marxists.org/admin/books/index.htm

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca