These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Interact with the world, baby going forward, or interact with the
buggy-pusher, baby going backwards.
I used to prefer the former,whilst chatting with my boys.
In fact the recommendation this morning was not to change buggy, but
to talk to babies/toddlers. But the research recommended
backward=facing buggies.....!
Shirley
On 21 Nov 2008, at 11:40, Bruce Robinson wrote:
> I woke up to this item on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 this
> morning which I thought might be of interest to XMCA:
>
> "Is it better to push your child in an outward facing buggy, so
> your baby looks out on the world, or an inward-facing one, where it
> sees your face you but little else? Researchers have been tackling
> this question and their findings suggest that inward-facing prams
> could be better for your child's development and well-being.
> Zubeida Malik asks some mothers what they made of it. Dr Suzanne
> Zeedyk, senior lecturer at Dundee University, discusses the
> research findings."
>
> The mothers seemed puzzled by the conclusions (which were presented
> as outward-facing buggies mean less psychological development,
> though I'm not sure how you screen out all the other factors that
> affect it). Their response was that there was more stimulus looking
> out at the world than at the mother's face. There was no mention of
> the age of the children which must make a difference.
>
> The interview can be heard from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/
> today/newsid_7741000/7741073.stm
>
> Suzanne Zeedyk describes her research as:"My empirical work on
> parent-infant interaction gives particular attention to questions
> about the development of the self, within the context of dyadic
> communication. My original focus on typical infant development has
> come to encompass atypical developmental circumstances that impair
> communicative abilities (e.g., sensory impairment, autism, learning
> disabilities, severe early neglect)."
>
> Should Vygotskyans favour inward-looking buggies? That was my first
> thought.
>
> Bruce R |
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Fri Nov 21 03:56:33 2008