These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Alexander,
Can't we say that thinking and speech have independent roots within
individual ontogenesis, but that in the longer view of cultural evolution
both have their origins in human biology? I don't have the texts in front of
me, but this seems to me to be the line of Vygotsky's reasoning.
Martin
On 3/24/08 10:59 PM, "Alexander Surmava" <monada@netvox.ru> wrote:
> The first
> idea that thinking and speech have different and independent roots is
> basically incompatible with the next one concerning their "dialectical"
> interaction. Those which are mutually alien are doomed to fruitful
> superficial relation and any genuine dialectical relation in this case is
> totally impossible.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sat Mar 29 10:38 PDT 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 08:03:11 PDT