These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
I think the various emancipatory movements of the 1950s/60/70s have great
deal to do with cultural difference and how cultural difference plays out
in development, but I think it is a mistake to single out one wing of one
of those movements in just one country, for special mention.
Andy
At 08:32 PM 3/03/2008 -0800, you wrote:
>David,
> ...
>
> I'm wondering whether you think an adequate knowledge of the Panthers
> is necessary for categorizing them as a what you call a "neoformation"
> . I personally find it somewhat suspicious. It's also hard for me to
> see how anyone can generalize from ideographic interpretations of
> classroom discourse to institutions that grew out of broad social
> movements even if one did have a good understanding of those institutions.
> cordially,
> Paul
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Mon Mar 3 22:06 PST 2008