Thanks, Ellen, for this comprehensive view into your use of ATLAS. I've
used it in related ways and found the Network View features especially
helpful for visualizing relationships and allowing for a different sort
of playing around than is available with my pre-computer methods of
sorting and scattering across the floor and walls (although I still do
need to go back to that, too).
There are some really good online resources for comparing different
strengths/weaknesses of qual software. A good place to start is the
CAQDAS (computer-assisted qualitative data analysis) networking project
at Surrey headed by Ann Lewins.
http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/
Over the years, they've done a series of comparisons, the most recent of
which can be had here:
http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/ChoosingLewins&SilverV5July06.pdf
This led to the recent publication (2007) of a useful book that's a good
complement to the ATLAS.ti user's guide:
Ann Lewins & Christina Silver, Using Software in Qualitative Research :
A Step-by-Step Guide, Sage Publications, London
A tutorial site<Online QDA, at Huddersfield U. that's an offshoot of the
networking project is here:
http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/index.php
The site has links to several other very useful websites.
If you really want to go spelunking, take a look at the above site's
resources section.
http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/resources.php
David
~
David Eddy Spicer, Ed.D.
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Ellen Scully-Russ wrote:
> Helena,
>
> I am currently using Atlasti for my dissertation study. I have never used
> EnVivo so I cannot comment on it. I will start with what I find useful
> about Atlas and then share some its limitations from my point of view.
>
> I have used to it conduct several literature reviews - I linked journal
> articles, chapters from e-books, and notes from other readings. So it was
> helpful in the creation of my conceptual framework for my study - and many
> of the codes I will use to analyze my data already reside inside the
> program.
>
> I have just completed data collection and most of it has been linked to
> program. My data consists of transcripts from 15 in-depth interviews of 2
> -3 hours in length, one media product - ranging from videos, articles,
> web-sites, brochures - shared by each of the participants, field notes from
> 25 meetings and events I attended, transcripts from 10 expert interviews,
> and excepts from my research journal. So you can see, the tool allows
> access to a variety of document types and media formats. It is enormously
> versatile in that way.
>
> I am now working to align the conceptual codes from my lit review with what
> I think I learned through my field work and data collection. The software
> is very useful in this process for it allows me to track any changes I make
> to the coding scheme and to document my rationale. I can eliminate, add,
> and combine codes and write and link a memo on those changes - everything is
> in one place. I find the memo feature very helpful - it resides inside the
> program and can be linked a number of objects inside the program (codes,
> quotes, documents). What is most helpful about this is that I do not have
> to interface with other software - like word - in order to journal a
> thought or document a change. This aids with multi-tasking and minimizes
> the risk that something important may get lost.
>
> Perhaps the strongest features though are those that aid in the analysis
> itself, which I must admit, I am still learning. If you use the
> relationship features (found in code manager), which I strongly suggest you
> do - it can tell you at a quick glance not only the frequency of your use of
> a particular code, but the density of the code - or the number of other
> codes it is related to. This feature is very helpful as I begin to think
> about the relationships between codes which I find particularly difficult to
> do if I am just looking at the number of times I used a code. In addition,
> codes can be grouped into families and then mapped using the embedded mind
> map which aids in the testing of different conceptual frameworks and
> hypothesis. Finally, one feature I have not used yet, but am anxious to try
> out is the one that allows you to track the relationship between the codes
> inside each transcript. For example, you can probe for patterns in when
> codes appear inside the data. Do certain codes appear in conjunction with
> other codes - pointing to a relationship that should be explored.
>
> I also understand that you can set it up so that several people can access
> the program facilitating the work of study teams.
>
> Many of my colleagues do not like qual research software because they say
> that they need to 'see' and 'touch' their data - and to manipulate in their
> own way in order to understand it. I can appreciate their point of view,
> but I find that Atlas actually facilitates this process once one gets
> familiar with 'how it works'. So like any new tool, there is an learning
> curve so one must decide whether it is worth the investment of time to set
> it up and struggle through the problems that will inevitable occur when
> trying something new. I found that by using it to conduct several lit
> review, and making many mistakes that I struggled to correct - before I took
> the risk of using it on a 'high stakes' endeavor like the analysis of
> dissertation data - gave me more confidence to use it now. A little
> background on me - I am a 'mid-career' student so I did not grow up using
> computers. I am not fearful of computers, I use one every day in my work.
> But I have never advanced beyond the level of an average user of the
> software I have access to. If you and your team are younger and more
> computer 'savvy' than I, you may find it less challenging to adapt.
>
> One final observation in this regard. The manual is very dense - I find
> myself having to go back and re-read many of the sections prior to using
> certain features because I have difficulty understanding both the task that
> they are explaining as well as the instructions on how to perform the task.
> I think it is because it was originally written in German by German software
> engineers and so I think I may get lost in translation. But the good news
> is that their tech support is very responsive - they respond to emails
> within one business day and I have found their advise to be helpful. Also I
> think there is an online community you can tap into for more help if you
> have the time to do so.
>
>
> Best of luck
>
> Ellen Scully-Russ
> Doctoral Candidate
> Columbia University, Teachers College
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
> Behalf Of Worthen, Helena Harlow
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:45 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [xmca] REquest for evalu of software
>
> Hello:
>
> Does anyone on this list have experience with either Atlasti or EnVivo for
> the purpose of analyzing transcribed interviews? We may or may not decide to
> buy one of these. There will be 40-50 interviews are about an hour long,
> structured by about 15 questions.
>
> Thanks -- Helena
>
> Helena Worthen, Clinical Associate Professor
> Labor Education Program, Institute of Labor & Industrial Relations
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> 504 E. Armory, Room 227
> Champaign, IL 61821
> Phone: 217-244-4095
> hworthen@uiuc.edu
> http://lep.ilir.uiuc.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Jan 24 14:15 PST 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 13 2008 - 12:33:27 PST