It is so interesting to me that this area of research holds within its
realm references beyond the work of CHAT and socio-cultural study. The
thesis adams and aizawa present is grounded in positivist thinking and only
relates merely to a subject-object world. Dialectic relations are ignored
and their argument states nothing of culture or contextual boundaries. In
my view it is a very short-sighted work. Here is a web address for a reply
to the paper:
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/1443/1/coupling2.pdf
However, in this rebuttal there is no mention of cultural contexts either.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Dec 6 07:15 PST 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 10:13:50 PST