mike,
how about xmca-ophiles, which is somewhat more accurate and a characteristic undoubtedly share by all?
paul
Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
DEAR XMCA-O-NAUGHTS (nowhere to go but up from naught, right?!)--
The Polls will remain open for the next couple of days and then will be
summarily
and insensitively closed by the naught-mighty balefulwolf.
Visit http://www.lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Journal/poll.htm.
Read abstracts, weight choices, agonize if it helps. And then vote for what
you would like to discuss.
Three great choices.
And do not worry. A donkey may die between two haystacks, but nothing like
that third stack to help
the beastie triangulate on reality with members of the community and make a
useful choice.
(signed),
subjectively inaccessibly yours. aka "He who was chosen this evening to
channel for the ever studious and Balefull wolf.
mike+
PS. For newcomers, the article chosen is made available free from the
publishers via the web so we can discuss before the obligatory
3 year time cycle for printed journal-mediated scholarly discourse has
transpired.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
---------------------------------
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Nov 29 12:31 PST 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 10:18:42 PST