Yes, and the ZPD reminds me of the term Gibson used to describe
perception in a way, which made it possible to bridge between the
objective and subjective perception, which he named "/affordances/".
and I agree with Armando, the ZPD is something between the individual
and the other(s) - and it gets facilitated by common joint activities.
But that does not mean, that I can not take what I learn in a ZPD with
me, to others places, other and maybe even more developmental ZPD's.
Just a thought, - that the real fantastic principles in psychology are
not either/or individual/collective principles, but both, at the same
time, in a dialectical way.
It is therefore so wonderful to read Vygotsky - ´cause nobody has,
IMHO, come up with a clearer description of the ZPD than made by
Vygotsky in Denken und Sprechen, 2002, which is the translation by
Lompscher et al. .
Volker
Armando Perez skrev:
> Eric: I dont like to look at ZPD as individual but as
> a colective interperson al situation. This means that
> ZPD do not belong to an individual but it is
> constructed or co-constructed. I also work in
> educational aplication of Vygotsky and I am tried to
> unified the concept od ZPD and Social Situation odf
> Development. What do you think about that
> Armando
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2007 - 10:11:31 PST