[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: math for reproduction and domination

To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: math for reproduction and domination
From: Bill Barowy <xmcageek@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:52:22 -0500
Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
In-reply-to: <31C7578D-33FE-11D9-8ABB-000A958F4E1E@uvic.ca>
Old-return-path: <owner-xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
References: <002601c4c7b2$a4f12630$6400a8c0@CPQ25317245517> <200411111043.33727@complexity.summit.net> <31C7578D-33FE-11D9-8ABB-000A958F4E1E@uvic.ca>
Reply-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Resent-date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Resent-message-id: <Wa7-RC.A.5MB.Fj5kBB@weber>
Resent-sender: xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1

On Thursday 11 November 2004 11:24 am, Wolff-Michael Roth wrote:
> historical situation of the activity system. You seem to advocate that
> we can understand children's and their teachers' actions just by
> looking at a classroom. 

I just can't believe YOU edited MY paper in MCA and can still make that claim!  
I'm going to step back and look at our own conversation.  This is not the 
kind of troublemaking i'm interested in.

bb

Follow-Ups:
- Re: math for reproduction and domination
  - From: Wolff-Michael Roth <mroth@uvic.ca>

References:
- Re: education, technology & chat (The Mathematics of it)
  - From: "Peg Griffin" <Peg.Griffin@worldnet.att.net>
- math for reproduction and domination
  - From: Bill Barowy <xmcageek@comcast.net>
- Re: math for reproduction and domination
  - From: Wolff-Michael Roth <mroth@uvic.ca>

Prev by Date: RE: math for reproduction and domination
Next by Date: RE: Civil War vs Election
Previous by thread: Re: math for reproduction and domination
Next by thread: Re: math for reproduction and domination
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread