> Establshing shared goals/visions?
> trust?
> division of labor?
> complementarity?
>
> Which of these things would remove from your own conception of culture?
SHAREDness of goals
Trust.
What do you think?
Judy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:38 PM
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: re: cr&c
>
>
>
> I can see that those working to create activities where
> reflective practice
> is valued and implemented have good reason not to want to substitute
> culture into Bill's paragraph. I am, of course, speaking of culture as
> (better, from) a particular perspective and it is polysemic. Reflective
> practice is also polysemic. Even the word polysemic is polysemic.
>
> However, which of the following things is not characteristic of culture
> as understood in chat discourse:
>
> I am also uncomfortable about the substtution as I think collaborative
> reflection is a highly specific practice and there are some important
> principles that givern it including the establishment of a shared
> vision or
> goal, the establishment of trust, division of labor, complementarity, etc.
>
> Establshing shared goals/visions?
> trust?
> division of labor?
> complementarity?
>
> Which of these things would remove from your own conception of culture?
> mike
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 11:42:23 PST
The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.