Re: Jim Gee on 3 identities in videogaming

From: Andy Blunden (ablunden@mira.net)
Date: Thu Dec 25 2003 - 16:52:26 PST


Nice try Eugene. But this one failed as well! Can you try converting it to
a different format. I am busting with anticipation!!
:)
Andy
At 07:48 PM 25/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>
>
>Andy and others, you can access Gees text at
>
><http://ematusov.soe.udel.edu/Gee,%203%20identities%20in%20videogaming,%202003.pdf>http://ematusov.soe.udel.edu/Gee,%203%20identities%20in%20videogaming,%202003.pdf
>
>
>
>
>Eugene
>
>
>
>----------
>From: Andy Blunden [mailto:ablunden@mira.net]
>Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 7:26 PM
>To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>Subject: RE: Mead, Honneth and role-taking play
>
>
>
>Could you send that pdf again Eugene. I got an error when I tried to open it.
>Andy
>
>
>
>Dear Andy and everybody
>
>
>
>I have started describing Gees 3 identities in videogaming (person,
>player, and character) but then I decided to scan Gees small section
>describing his notions. Sorry for this laziness (and poor quality of my
>home scanner) but I think Gee in his own voice explains better than I.
>
>
>
>Please share your ideas and observations while reading this fragment of
>Gees book. In my view, his observations are helpful but a bit too
>individualistic& but lets talk after you read his piece.
>
>
>
>Eugene
>
>
>
>----------
>From: Andy Blunden [mailto:ablunden@mira.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 7:53 PM
>To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>Subject: RE: Mead, Honneth and role-taking play
>
>
>
>Thank you Eugene!
>You know it's so easy to learn from an old Marxist (Elkonin) that some
>concept (role-play) is an historical product, and then in the very next
>minute forget to reflect on the work that history has done since, in
>producing one's own times!!
>
>Just one question about Gee's idea: What is meant by the "emerging
>three-fold identities in a player during video games"? I am totally
>intrigued and cannot guess!
>
>Andy
>At 12:22 PM 24/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Dear Andy and everybody
>
>
>
>Andy, let me add my 0.2 cents to your discussion. It is a bit arrogant for
>me to contribute since role-taking play is not my area, so sorry if my
>naïve comments offend somebody who specializes in this area&
>
>
>
>I think that in time of Vygotsky, Elkonin (senior), Mead, and Honneth,
>role-taking plays were predominately childrens activities in Western
>cultures and thus were seen as developmental(see Elkonins notion of
>leading activitiesassociated with ontogenesis). The closest adult activity
>to role-taking plays that was legitimate and recognizable by the (high?)
>society was literature writing (theater performance, unless fully
>improvisational, was too scripted) which has never involved mass
>participation of general adult public. Currently, with explosion of
>computer and video games, the situation is rapidly changing. Role-taking
>plays become legitimate (widespread) adult activities in Western societies
>(I do not know history enough to claim that in past role-taking games had
>been also legitimate adult activities recognized by the society but I
>suspect that role-taking plays were always with adults in some forms of
>fantasies that were not recognized by the society).
>
>
>
>I think that the recent book by Jim Gee
>
>Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and
>literacy (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
>
>
>
>is the first sign that this change is recognized by the academia. I found
>that Jims analysis of emerging three-fold identities in a player during
>video games is somewhat similar to Bakhtins analysis of relationship
>between author and his/her character (in Bakhtins earlier writing see his
>book Art and answerability). I think that non-developmental perspectives
>can provide us with more insights about the nature of role-taking plays.
>
>
>
>What do you think?
>
>
>
>Eugene
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 01:00:10 PST

The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.