Am I the only one to note the irony that the discussion of paper on
'Estranged Learning' was delayed as a result of that paper's status as a
commodity (i.e. the ownership of the copyrights)?
Is there any particular structure for discussion of the paper (e.g. a
summariser) or should we just fire off views?
Bruce Robinson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Cole" <mcole@weber.ucsd.edu>
To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Sent: 10 December 2002 22:58
Subject: no longer estranged!
>
> The estranged learning paper by lave and mcdermott is indeed at the top
> of the list of papers to be discussed and, as previously, I warmly
recommend
> it to xmca readers, along with the journal in which it appears, Outlines.
>
> I hope everyone enjoys reading it as much as Jean and Ray obviously
enjoyed
> writing..... enough food for thought to last until New Years and not even
> fattening.
> mike
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 01:00:07 PST