Here is some interesting news. The evaluations of a proposal for aera 2003
to another sig have come back and a portion of one follows. A second was
similar. Looks like we still need to get the word out there about CHAT as a
framework for study. I'll do my part.
"This barren verbiage current among men."
--Tennyson.
bb
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>: A proposal like this is very difficult to evaluate, because the
>: qualitative nature of the study makes it difficult to summarize in 3
>: pages. For example, a theoretical orientation is stated in the proposal,
>: but its not really clear how that guided the study or the interpretation
>: of results. In the proposal, phrases like "cultural historical activity
>: theory" come off as empty verbiage. I hope that the authors will have an
>: opportunity to expand and explain what that means to them and how it
>: helped to guide this study.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 01:00:07 PST