Hmmmm.
How about, "Using Cultural Historical Tools -- [but] To What End?"
Anyone else "out there" ?? or "here" ??
hello?
judy
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Barowy [mailto:wbarowy@attbi.com]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:44 PM
To: ch-sig@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ch-sig] Schemes and SIG Themes
Hi Folks,
I'd appreciate if someone would please forward this note to xmca -- I'm not
presently subscribed there.
With an August 1 deadline for aera proposals, if the ch-sig theme is to help
in the reviewing process, then proposers may wish to converge on a theme
with
rapidity. That is to say, if we project forward on the aera proposal
deadline by one month, in order to give time for people to prepare
adequately
(barely so?) then the sig theme may need to be addressed sometime in the
very
near present - kinda NOW-like. I would like to offer three proposals, three
being the minimum necessary by Arrow's impossibility theorem for an
irrational solution by an ensemble of rational voters. One draws upon what
Pedro has written earlier today.
1) Sharing the Responsibility: The versatility of Cultural Historical tools
for addressing educational quality.
(cobbles together the iscrat "diversity" and the aera theme)
2) Anything goes.
3) Forget the sig theme -- let's not do one. (But please make sure that
there are at least a minimum requisite number or proposals for symposia).
Options 2 and 3 may appear indistinguishable, but upon further thought you
may find they are also indistinguishable from option 1.
--
(:^{>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ch-sig-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 01:00:10 PDT