Re: Two examples of emergence

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 05:46:20 PDT


In a message dated 6/3/2002 3:55:35 AM Central Daylight Time,
mollyfreeman@telis.org writes:

> The complex approach....is total Taoist. In Taoism there is no inherent
> order. ...The universe in Taoism is perceived as vast, amorphous, and
> ever-changing. You can never nail it down. the elements always stay the
> same, yet they're always rearranging themselves. So it's like a
> kaleidoscope: the world is a matter of patterns that change, that partly
> repeat, but never quite repeat, that are always new and different.
>

Molly;

In Vaalsiner's Culture and the Development of Children's Actions he does a
nice job of critiquing all of the systems theories and how they are helpful
for understanding human developemnt and how they fall short in their
explanantion. I agree complex/chaos thoery appears too haphazard and not
systematic enough to explain the coordinated chaos that is human existance.

eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 01 2002 - 01:00:06 PDT

The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.