Re(2): Words as commodity/client

From: Andy Blunden (andy@mira.net)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 20:34:32 PDT

Next message: Diane Hodges: "Re: Folie (was re: theory/practice)"
Previous message: Diane Hodges: "owning the zoped (was words as commodity/client)"
Next in thread: Phil Graham: "Re: Words as commodity/client"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Andy, I am with Phil on this one. I am not certain that the replacement:
>"service recipient" , is any better.

>Obviously I expressed myself badly. "Service recipient" is exactly the
>same as client and that's whay I oppose it!

Next message: Diane Hodges: "Re: Folie (was re: theory/practice)"
Previous message: Diane Hodges: "owning the zoped (was words as commodity/client)"
Next in thread: Phil Graham: "Re: Words as commodity/client"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 15:49:10 PDT