Re: theory/practice

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Wed Aug 29 2001 - 18:33:56 PDT


In a message dated 8/29/2001 9:57:08 AM Central Daylight Time,
bruce.rob@btinternet.com writes:

> It seems to me that throughout this discussion you are confusing a number of
> different things here that are not identical: positivism, reductionism, and
>

Bruce,

thank you for the lesson, I have always equated positivism with empirical
knowledge. When I speak of scientific method I speak of it in a general
sense as being the opposite of spontaneous day-to-day thought. The one
common thread thoughout all methods is that there is a structured process for
studying one's environment. Spontaneous thought can be somewhat unstructured
and allow for more haphazard perceptions.

Eric

Eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 01:02:20 PDT

The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.