Re: time=development=activity

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 21:13:13 PDT


In a message dated 5/18/2001 3:55:30 AM Central Daylight Time,
illonph@pacbell.net writes:

> The abstract representation of all changes related to all other
> changes would still not provide an absolute temporal framework since an
> additional one, ultimately static, would be required: aka ETERNITY even if
> its a bounded eternity where time has a beginning and an end.
>

Hegel speaks to the dialectic and within each livable moment there exists the
'alpha & the omega". See my discussion about my wife placing parameters upon
my appreciation of a sunset for the definition of a moment.

Time still on my side,
eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2001 - 01:01:33 PDT

The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.