Re: Phil's suggestions

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 09:35:48 PDT

Next message: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Previous message: Phil Graham: "Re: Phil's suggestions"
Maybe in reply to: Eva Ekeblad: "Phil's suggestions"
Next in thread: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Reply: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eva,

The definition I gave for subjective was straight from Webster's. Take up
the argument with them.

Eric

Next message: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Previous message: Phil Graham: "Re: Phil's suggestions"
Maybe in reply to: Eva Ekeblad: "Phil's suggestions"
Next in thread: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Reply: Paul H.Dillon: "re: subjective/objective and all that stuff"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 01 2001 - 01:01:54 PDT