Thanks a lot for the seemingly useful reference, Peter!!!!
Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Smagorinsky [mailto:psmagorinsky@home.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 4:06 PM
To: xmca@ucsd.edu
Subject: RE: horizontal/vertical//dialogue/dialectic
At 01:54 PM 4/9/01 -0400, you wrote:
I'm looking for Dialogic Theory of History which has to be fragmented,
multi-voiced and collective (one person can't present it),
non-comprehensive, situated, non-reductionist... I'm not sure that it
can
even be a theory or what media it can exist. Any ideas?
This may not be exactly what you're looking for, but in:
Wertsch, J. V. (1999). Revising Russian history. Written
Communication, 16, 267-295.
Wertsch looks at the way in which newer Russian history books are dialogic
with Soviet history books--actually the dialogism is "hidden" i.e. not
explicit--in that the historical revisions refute the Soviet versions. I've
drawn on this article several times when looking at the ways in which
writers acknowledge prior texts when producing new texts.
Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 01 2001 - 01:01:47 PDT