Pardon the confusion -- which Engeström article is to be discussed? It is the one in the 1986 LCHC newsletter on zoped?
>If folks want to read the pesonality chapter of cole and cole could we
>please postpone it until: 1) We have spent some time discussing articles
>in MCA (note relation to Xmca!). Have planned discussion of Engestrom?
>
>If the answer is no, I will post the chapter. It is from an intro
>psychology textbook. I am absolutely certain it is guilty of sins of
>binarism, paternalism, whiteness and would be highly interested in
>people's comments-- after, like Andy, they have read it.
>mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:56 PST