I was responding in part to the discussion of Carl's paper and in part to a
discussion elsewhere and in part an email exchange -- too many audiences
and none well addressed.
let me clarify my puzzlement re: Carl's paper -- Mike, Andy and Nate have
addressed the apparent schism between cultural/individual.... I'm
interested in Carl's reply. I was also responding to Carl's comments on
Bruner, which seemed to be overstated, just as Bruner's assertions re:
individual 'freedom' seem overstated. In other words, there is material for
polarizing values in the complex mix that is sociocultural practice. So I
wondered if Carl was objecting to "negotiation" and "dialog" as Bruner used
the terms in a particular discussion or to "negotiation" and "dialog" in
general as resources for collective action. Perhaps I am inserting polar
terms where none were intended.
Carl, sorry if I've oversimplified the issues as you see them.
And sorry for the previous ambiguous message.
>Here's some evidence of all that I don't understand --- Im interested in
>how participants on this list evaluate the following statement, which,
>speaking for myself, makes eminent sense:
>
>Cognition has its genesis in object-oriented, productive activity.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Judith
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:55 PST
The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.