I'd like to say something about Carl's paper. I have read it carefully and
enjoyed it thoroughly. Indeed, if one believes in Vygotsky and activity
theory, G.H. Mead and symbolic interactionism, and Habermas and his theory of
communicative action, one cannot but embrace Carl's "expose." Carl's
impressive scholarship brings in his paper, implicitely or explicitely, the
theses defended by some revolutionary and profoundly insightful
psychologists, such as Vygotsky and Mead, social theory and culture, which
mainstream psychology continues to ignore, unfortunately. This, probably
because, even though mainstream psychology claims it has ridded itself of
behaviorism by re-introducing "subjectivity" during the "cognitive
revolution" of the 1960s and 1970s, it nonetheless continues to hold on to
the positivistic logic and the mechanistic worldview that are at the heart of
behaviorism.
Doris.
The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.