M wrote:
>
>
> Bourdieu talks about structured structuring dispositions
>(which he called habitus) a notion that was taken up by Jean Lave
>(1988).
thanks for the note - i've enjoyed all of Bourdieu that i've read and
regrettably i've not got one of his books in my own library - so now, i
shall head off to Tattered Cover and order up some -
>
>
>So I don't see why a distinction between real world and other world
>is necessary. The child's world is different, because all of our
>lifeworlds ('umwelts'...) are different from the phenomenological
>perspective, but at the same time, they are not entirely independent
>because developed under similar conditions.
yes - i absolutely agree
>
>
>I am not sure whether it makes sense to distinguish inside world from
>outside world, they are likely to share considerable structure, and
>the changes are on a continuous scale rather than from black to
>white, inside to outside.
thanks for the reminder - sometimes i don't juggle all of what i know
very well.
>
>
i do appreciate your comments.
(are you really referred to as M? as in your signature ...)
phillip
>
>
>
>
* * * * * * *
*
The English noun "identity" comes, ultimately, from the
Latin adverb "identidem", which means "repeatedly."
The Latin has exactly the same rhythm as the English,
buh-BUM-buh-BUM - a simple iamb, repeated; and
"identidem" is, in fact, nothing more than a
reduplication of the word "idem", "the same":
"idem(et)idem". "Same(and) same". The same,
repeated. It is a word that does exactly what
it means.
from "The Elusive Embrace" by Daniel
Mendelsohn.
phillip white
third grade teacher
doctoral student http://ceo.cudenver.edu/~hacms_lab/index.htm
scrambling a dissertation
denver, colorado
phillip_white@ceo.cudenver.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:53 PST