On Friday, January 05, 2001 1:42 AM, Paul H.Dillon [SMTP:illonph@pacbell.net] wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Are you familiar with Carspecken's "Critical Ethnography in Educational
> Research"? He uses a Habermasian framework based on validity claims against
> the three ontological domains that structure Habermas' theory of
> communicative action. Carspecken's work is very specific and almost a
> step-by-step how-to guide but it presumes that you accept Habermasian
> theory. Another interesting piece, one that draws on dialectical
> materialist theory explicitly, including David Harvey and Ilyenkov, is David
> Wainwright's "Can Sociological Research be Qualitative, Critical, and
> Valid?" which isn't so programmatic but definitely discusses the
> relationship between interview data and theory.
Paul,
Can you give me the full reference for Wainwright?
Thanks.
Bruce Robinson
> Paul H. Dillon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill Barowy <wbarowy@lesley.edu>
> To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 3:00 PM
> Subject: Interview method question
>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Sharan Merriam's book "Case Study Research in Education" describes 3 forms
> of interview; a) survey, b) semistructured, c) unstructured. All of these
> types ignore theory as a means to guide questions. So apparently there is
> also at least a "d) theoretically coordinated interview". Have any of you
> a reference for this type of thing?
> >
> > thanks,
> > bb
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:52 PST
The LCHC website last updated in 2022. The files now available herein are being maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes. The content of the site has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.