So mike,
what do you conclude, one unit of analysis for everyone pitching tents in
the CHAT campground, or many depending on whether the specific interest is
socialization or social change? xmca seems something of the campfire that
people sit around, no? different stories, skits, and songs. More
specifically. for example, i've been wondering whether people consider the
ZPD to be a unit of analysis in the same sense as word meaning. My feeling
is that it isn't. What do you think?
Paul H. Dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Cole <mcole@weber.ucsd.edu>
To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 9:15 AM
Subject: 20 cents, canadian
>
> I have been away for a few days and have to pay penance for my
> absence, so I am still back on dancers/dances/oaks/swans and
> progress.
>
> I want to add my 20c canadian i brought home in my pocket to
> Paul's comments on the multiciplity of units of analysis corresponding
> to different objects/ives. Collaborative discussion among this
> heterogeneous group joined by a fuzzy family relationship seems
> like the mode of discourse most likely to produce emergent properties
> that the participants could feel was progress, individually
> and
> collectively.
> mike
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:00:40 PDT