Re: transactions

From: Judy Diamondstone (diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 10:30:46 PDT


ooo, diane -- Eugene will speak for himself, but I think you misread his
message. I don't think he's capable, poor thing, of simplistic analyses :)
-Also, he was distinguishing (following Rogoff et al) oranismic from
transactional....

I'm interested in images of relationship -- I responded to the image invoked
by the word. The image of a transaction doesn't work for me -- i think of
transaction as a 1-way process, therefore, not EVEN circular causality.....

It
>>is more than just circular causality because the two objects has a
>>transactional relation -- they can't exist without each other

>

Judith Diamondstone (732) 932-7496 Ext. 352
Graduate School of Education
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
10 Seminary Place
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1183



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:00:38 PDT