Eva,
This little example of autoregulation, ie Bill's statement concerning the
existence of the worm and provision of the sites for its remedy (which I
used immediately) provides an interesting example of an overlap between the
first and the third level of your interlinked activity system model for
xmca.
Paul H. Dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: Eva Ekeblad <eva.ekeblad@goteborg.utfors.se>
To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2000 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: worms
Being on a Mac, using Eudora, I can report this:
There have been two xmca postings carrying some very interesting garbage at
the end -- it looks like the code for the worm un-dish-covered.
The first one was Michael Erickson's *Bagels and Ontology*, sent at Fri, 23
Jun 2000 17:37:46 -0400 and the second one Paul Dillon's reply to same at
Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:44:40 -0700 -- after that y'all seem to be clean.
Get well!
Eva
At 17.56 -0700 0-06-24, Paul H. Dillon scrobe:
>Judy,
>
>I don't think you got it from me, I received a message saying my response
to
>Michael E's message had been cleaned up before being posted to xmca. If
>this is the case, however, how did Michael's get past the virus software>?>
>
>Paul H. Dillon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 01 2000 - 01:00:42 PDT