nate sez:
>I don't think this means that meaning is not in the text or individual,
>but
>rather those divisions are not useful (for me). I also do not think this
>implies a neo-instrumental view that meaning is whatever an activity makes
>of it. The fact remains (in my mind) that meaning is not as dymanic as we
>might assume.
i'm with you - activities are dynamic, but they work around kinds of
meanings that tend to be connected to more stable entities, like
(oooh here she goes agin!!) ideological practice and
tradition/normalization.
diane
**********************************************************************
:point where everything listens.
and i slow down, learning how to
enter - implicate and unspoken (still) heart-of-the-world.
(Daphne Marlatt, "Coming to you")
***********************************************************************
diane celia hodges
university of british columbia, centre for the study of curriculum and
instruction
==================== ==================== =======================
university of colorado, denver, school of education
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 09:21:17 PDT