Mike,
That seems too far in my mind. I have never heard of any research where you
seek permission for its use although Gloria Landsing Billings work gets
pretty close. I guess I think, like one would do with any "site", you seek
permission to use the material not how its used. It seems that one should
be asked permission to use ones messages but beyond that it is stepping on
academic freedom.
I would be curious how UCSD is adressing human subjects though. Since that
one study where someone died several Universities are being audited. The
costs are high because if you fail the audit all human research system wide
is suspended.
Nate
Nate Schmolze
http://www.geocities.com/nate_schmolze/
schmolze@students.wisc.edu
****************************************************************************
****************
"Overcoming the naturalistic concept of mental development calls for a
radically new approach
to the interrelation between child and society. We have been led to this
conclusion by a
special investigation of the historical emergence of role-playing. In
contrast to the view
that role playing is an eternal extra-historical phenomenon, we hypothesized
that role playing emerged at a specific stage of social development, as the
child's position in society changed
in the course of history. role-playing is an activity that is social in
origin and,
consequently, social in content."
D. B. El'konin
****************************************************************************
****************
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 6:59 PM
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: re anyone object
You may be right, eva. The best thing might be to start by saying, "I am
planning to write about x, does anyone involved in the discussion of x
mind?" Then, somwhere in the process, tell every9one who was involved
in discussion X, "Hi-- I have a draft of the paper about discussion X
on my web page at: please let me know if it is ok for me to use this
material in the way I have.
If you get a positive response, include. If you get no response or a
negative response, exclude.
Why am I being so picky? Because I have been reading about the use of
"passive consent" procedures in human subjects research, which has a lot
of questionable features, and I think we ought to exclude because I
am afraid it will stifle discussion.
I already hear enough about people's fears of posting! Indifference is
fine, but fear is unacceptable as a norm.
Real rule-minded in sunny s.d.
Thanks for helping us think about this Judy/
mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 09:21:11 PDT