These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Bergson on duration

From: Paul Dillon (dillonph@northcoast.com)
Date: Tue Dec 07 1999 - 00:33:34 PST


"It is true that we count successive moments of duration, and that, because
of its relations with number, time at first seems to us to be a measurable
magnitude, just like space. But there is here an important distinction to
be made. I say, e.g., that a minute has just elapsed, and I mean by this
that a pendulum, beating the seconds, has completed sixty oscillations. If
I picture these sixty oscillations to myself all at once by a single mental
perception, I exclude by hypothesis the idea of succession. I don not think
of sixty strokes which succeed one another, but of sixty points on a fixed
line, each one of which symbolizes, so to speak, an oscillation of the
pendulum. If, on the other hand, I wish to picture these sixty oscillations
in succession, but without altering the way they are produced in space, I
shall be compelled to think of each oscillation to the exclusion of the
recollection of the preceding one, for space has preserved no trace of it;
but by doing so I shall condem myself to remain for ever in the present; I
shall give up the attempt to think a succession or a duration. No if,
finally, I retain the recollection of the preceding oscialation together
with the image of the present oscillation, one of two things will happen.
Either I shall set the two images side by side, and we fall back on our
first hypothesis, or I shall perceive one in the other, each permeating the
other and organizing them like the notes of a tine, so as to form what we
shall call a continuous or qualitative multiplicity with no resemblance to
number. I shall this get the image of a pure duration; but I shall have
entirely got rid of the idea of a homogeneous medium or a measurable
quantity."

-- Time and Free Will



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 14:04:06 PST