roth wrote:
> Me too!!!!!!!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Not exactly a phoenix - xmca arises
> Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
> Resent-From: xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu
> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 14:27:56 PDT
> From: Theresa Flynn <theresaflynn who-is-at hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu
> To: xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu
>
> OK.. this is weird. I got on this list, too, without subscribing. They've
> ovbiously hit some ed. institution lists. What IS xmca anyway? Get me off
> this please!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> >From: "Nancy Haas" <nancywh who-is-at home.com>
> >Reply-To: xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu
> >To: <xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu>
> >Subject: Re: Not exactly a phoenix - xmca arises
> >Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:27:33 -0700
> >
> >I am with Sandra on this one. ??? Please remove me from this list.
> >
> >Nancy Haas
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Sandra L. Longworth <sllongwo who-is-at students.wisc.edu>
> >To: <xmca who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu>
> >Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 5:56 AM
> >Subject: Re: Not exactly a phoenix - xmca arises
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how I got on this list, but I haven't ever heard of xmca.
> > > Could you take me off the list please?
> > >
> > > Thanks very much.
> > >
> > > At 04:30 PM 7/4/99 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > >For reasons yet to be determined, the distribution list for xmca
> > > >was seriously truncated on or about last Wednesday (probably a
> > > >result of my duelling with the TWU-induced gremlins). The
> > > >shortened nature of things was discovered this morning.
> > > >
> > > >In an effort to get the list back up and running in any sort of
> > > >useful fashion, I grepped a list of folks who had posted to xmca
> > > >over the past three months from the log files and re-created an
> > > >abbreviated distribution list (after culling those who had unsbscribed)
> > > >
> > > >The current dist list is about 1/2 the length of the list prior to
> > > >this recent spate of difficulties. However it probably contains
> > > >most, if not all of the folks who create the dialog online. The
> > > >lurkers, who will be added back when we can recover a copy of the
> > > >list from backup tapes (sometime Tues, in all probability) will just
> > > >have to catch up from the xmca web archives.
> > > >
> > > >If you were unsubscribed, and I failed to pull you from my new
> > > >list, just dump this in the bit bucket. You'll come back off the
> > > >list when I replace this dist list with the backup, Tues.
> > > >
> > > >mea culpa, and my apologies,
> > > >
> > > >bj
> > > >
> > > >p.s. This also means that anything you thought you posted after
> > > >Wed last, probably didn't go out. You can check the web archives to
> > > >see, as that account disappeared along with everyone elses, so the
> > > >archive represents the true state of what was distributed.
> > > >
> > > >-
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com